Actress Defends Her Thighs After Magazine Heavily Photoshops Them [PHOTOS].
Zendaya Coleman has criticised a fashion magazine for promoting “unrealistic” standards of beauty by apparently editing an image to make her appear thinner than she is.
“Had a new shoot come out today and was shocked when I found my 19 year old hips and torso quite manipulated,” Zendaya wrote on Instagram. “These are the things that make women self conscious, that create the unrealistic ideals of beauty that we have.” “So I took it upon myself to release the real pic (right side) and I love it.” (RELATED: This TV Show Host Just Apologized For Saying A Former Disney Star’s Dreadlocks Looked Like They Smelled Like Weed) Had a new shoot come out today and was shocked when I found my 19 year old hips and torso quite manipulated. At the time she said, “Trying new things [is when I feel most confident]”. “While you’re so concerned about what my parents look like, please know that these are two of the most selfless people in the world”. And I am going to make a wild leap here and guess that, when you were a kid, there was a stretch of time when you considered Part II the best Back to the Future. She proved that she was a total boss after defending YouTube makeup artist Shannon C, who showed off her bare face – which got bad male follower to share a side-by-side of her in makeup, and dare call her ugly. Thank you @modelistemagazine for pulling down the images and fixing this retouch issue.” Modeliste did not respond directly to Coleman’s claims when contacted by The Independent.
You definitely don’t have memories half as vivid of the rest of Part II, a movie that takes a Future Past curlicue into an alternate reality where a local brute’s financial success turned Hill Valley into Akira, before ultimately dead-ending into a lawsuit-baiting Part I clip show. In my life, I have met two species of human being: People who profess to love Part II and hate Part III, and people who profess to love Part III and feel extremely mild about Part II.
That’s because where Part II goes is the “to the Future” entry; Part III is the “Back.” So liking Part III means, in part, grooving onto the idea of a filmmaker transforming a franchise threequel into a love letter to cinema. It’s leisurely, with an undercurrent of delicate emotion (Doc Brown bonds with Clara over her telescope) and the goofiest farce (Doc Brown gets wasted).
